Free world, what are you willing to do?

Iran's Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki on Saturday announced that Teheran was preparing a new package of "political, security and international" issues to put to the West, and downplayed the criticism of Iran by world leaders at the G8 summit.

Isn't that just swell. The Iranians have a "new package of issues". The first thing that comes to mind is So What!? Do murderers get to pick what their punishment is? Do disobedient children get to pick what kind of punishment they will receive? The only answer Iran should be giving is a yes or a no. Otherwise, they will halt their uranium enrichment or they wont. We all know the answer anyway.

Iran is not going to stop building their nuclear capability and there is nothing outside of a military attack that will stop it. That is the plain truth like it or not. No strongly worded condemnation is going to stop this. Despite the fantasies of western diplomats, the Pen is NOT mightier than the sword.

"The package can be a good basis for talks with the West. The package will contain Iran's stances on political, security and international issues," Reuters quoted Mottaki as telling a press conference.

I don't need to read or hear Iran's stance's on these issues when I can see them daily. This is nothing more than a ploy to buy some extra time to finish what they started. They are Not going to stop developing nuclear abilities and they ARE going to build a nuclear weapon. Why should they stop? What consequence will they face once they have the bomb? Iran knows the west is full of cowards. The only fear they have is of Israel sending a massive sortie to destroy their facilities. They don't know how to gauge Binyamin Netanyahu so they don't know how to plan for his response.

Tragically the West is actually relying on Russia and China. Why should Russia talk Iran out of nukes when They're providing much needed assistance. The Cold War never ended. It only changed tactics.

E-mail me here.

And Then What?

"We're not going to just wait indefinitely and allow for the development of a nuclear weapon... and wake up one day and find ourselves in a much worse situation and unable to act," Obama said at the close of the G8 summit concluded in Italy.

And what are you going to do Barack Obama? Sanctions have yet to work. What kind of added sanctions can you place on Iran and how will you enforce them? Barack Obama is full of ambiguous phrases and utilizes them every chance he gets. Yet he has no intention of backing them up. He hasn't done it in the US why would he attempt to do it when dealing with foreign nations?

Barring Israeli intervention, Iran will develop a nuclear weapon. If Israel attacks the United Nations will go ape and launch a strongly worded tirade against the Zionists. The west will claim that sanctions were working. The west will claim that violence wasn't the answer. There will be all kinds of kumbyah moments. I'm sure Barack will call the Islamic despots and try to distance himself as far away from the attack as he can.

Barack Obama and the political party and the ideology he represents is pure coward and pure evil.

E-mail me here.

Welcome to Sharia-ca

Just in case you haven't seen this yet.

Plan for the worst

There is a saying that goes: "Plan for the worst and hope for the best". It is something that both the West and Israel should be doing right now. Instead, they are trying to convince themselves that Iran thinks in Western Rational way. (Though presently that term could be deemed oxymoronic).

According to these Israeli assessments, there is not much difference now between the US and Israel regarding a timeline for a "worst case scenario" on Iran's development of a bomb. At the same time, both Jerusalem and Washington currently believe that "worst case scenario is not likely to materialize."

Just where did this belief materialize? Is it blind hope that Iran won't do this or is it based on some intel source?

First off, as I have said numerous times, hope is not a strategy. Placing hope in a theocratic despot (ayatollah) is stupid and best and suicidal at worst.

Secondly, what intel sources? The same ones that missed seeing the fall of the USSR? The same ones who couldn't connect the dots with al-Quaeda? The same ones who asserted Saddam Hussein had WMD? I can't speak for other intel agencies but I do know that the American government has spent the last 30 years emasculating the American Intelligence services to a point where they are nothing but a bunch of paper pushing, suit and tie wearing, $500 haircut bureaucrats who despise actual people in the field of operations. They would rather get their information from satellites and other countries. Not only are we a consumer nation economically, we also rely on outsourcing of intelligence gathering. This definitely can't be relied on in regards to Iran.

There better be a plan in place to eradicate the Iranian threat once it is found out that they are making a nuclear device. We cannot afford to wait until then to start piecing one together. The American government has been wrong quite a bit over the last 30 years. From the economy to foreign policy we have shot ourselves in the foot on a regular basis. We either do nothing or we do the wrong thing. Tragically I don't believe the present administration has the knowledge or the will to do what must be done.

Israel is in no better shape. In the midst of all this hatred and angst for the tiny nation, they cannot afford to wait on America to say ok or to provide support. Israel MUST defend itself. Binyamin Netanyahu cannot allow Israel to take a "wait and see" approach. It may just wind up waiting to see a nuclear bomb go off in Haifa or Tel Aviv.

E-mail me here.

A catastrophe for whom?

A unilateral attack by Israel against Iran to thwart the Islamic republic's nuclear ambitions would be an "absolute catastrophe", French President Nicolas Sarkozy was quoted by AFP as saying on Thursday.

Just who would this be a catastrophe for? It would definitely be one for Iran and it's nuclear ambitions. It would be one for Momo and the Ayatollah. It would be one for Bashir Assad and Syria. In fact, it would be a major catastrophe for all the islamists who have a vested interest in Iran gaining nuclear weapons.

However, this is not the catastrophe that Mr. Sarkozy is referencing. What he means is that it would be a catastrophe for modern Western diplomacy. It would be a catastrophe for appeasement. It would be a catastophical stoke on western egos.

"Israel should know that it is not alone and look at all this calm. If I have fought so hard in the name of France to get people talking about Iran it's also a message to the Israelis that they are not alone," he said.

If by not being alone Mr. Sarkozy is referencing the western approach, I would rather be left alone. Winston Churchill once stated (I paraphrase) that "Americans will always do what is right. After they have exhausted all other avenues". This now applies to the entire western world. However, they now exhaust every avenue at least 20 times each. By the time they are ready to do what is right, what they were trying to stop is already in place.

Whereas islamists are insane because they are killing themselves one by one. The west is insane because it continually does the same thing and expects different results.

Thanks but no thanks Mr. Sarkozy. As General Patton once said (I paraphrase again) "I would rather have the enemy in front of me rather than the French behind me".

E-mail me here.

Providing for the enemy

If providing money, arms, and training wasn't enough, we are now bringing the enemy to America.

The US State Department confirmed Tuesday that as many as 1,350 Iraqi Palestinians - once well-treated guests of Saddam Hussein and now estranged from Iraqi society - will be resettled in the US, mostly in southern California, starting this fall, the Christian Science Monitor reported.

So they lived under the protection of an American enemy and now they can live here? They lived a life of privilege while their benefactor killed thousands. Now they get to live in the land of the free. How does any of this make sense? Leave the bastards in Iraq. Let them reap what they have sown.

How long before they find themselves creating the same kind of slum their brethren have created elsewhere? What favored status and how much money and support are they going to receive from the American taxpayer? They had no problem watching others killed while they lived well. Now they are going to find themselves refusing to assimilate and the problems Europe is having will explode here. American gangs now have a new enemy.

This is stupid.

E-mail me here.

Reality must sink in

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak did not (know) what he was talking about when he said captured IDF soldier Gilad Schalit was alive and well, a top Hamas official announced Wednesday, in rare public criticism of the Egyptian leader.

The truth must be faced no matter how hurtful it may be. There has been no proof of life for Gilad Schalit since he was kidnapped. No pictures, letters, or any other type of communication. Hamas is using the hope for Gilad Schalit to get what they want. They have learned from Hizbullah that Israel will trade even for a lifeless body. If the body is returned the autopsy will probably put the date of death to his capture date.

This is how evil Hamas is. They cannot be negotiated with and the definitely cannot be trusted. They are murderers and liars. They are the perfect representatives of their allah and his satanic prophet. In the end they will get exactly what they want and what they deserve. Death.

Hope is all that's left. Even that should be diminishing exponentially.

No negotiations. No setting up relations. No "palestinian" state with Hamas. It is time for Hamas and it's supporters to die a violent death. One Israeli is worth more than all the "palestinians". Make them pay the price.

E-mail me here.

Fear predicates cowardice

"My understanding of what Biden said is that the second part is the interesting part - not that Israel is sovereign to act, but that he said the United States acts differently. Essentially, he distinguished himself" from Israel, (Uzi) Arad said. "What was important for him was to transmit to the Iranians that we, the United States, are different."

To the anti-Israelis, islamists, and socialist in our midst this sounds good. To those of us who believe in supporting our friends and doing what is right, this is cowardice. This is also exactly the type of approach that the ayatollah is going to exploit. The ayatollah is aware of many things about our new President and is "worldly relations". He knows that Barack Obama has a fantastic Utopian view of a violent world. He knows that Barack Obama will sacrifice truth and fact for "hope". He also knows of the internal fight within this President in regards to his upbringing and his identity. In other words, this man has no understanding of himself how can he have an understanding of the world?

Ths islamists know they have someone they can manipulate and lie to and he will go to the well for them. After all, Barack Obama's father was a muslim. Every time a muslim is rightfully attacked it is as if his father is being attacked. This despite the fact his father was nothing more than a whore monger who took advantage of a woman. I bet this makes the son proud.

Barack Obama and his supporters have no problem lying to themselves or to others as long as they can pretend that everything will be ok. In the end, they don't care how many must die or if they live in slavery. And if you weren't aware, they believe slavery to be better than death.

Israel cannot afford to trust the present American administration. As each day passes this becomes more obvious.

E-mail me here.

What's so stable about it?

"I believe Iran is very focused on developing this capability, and I think when they get it, or should they get it, it will be very destabilizing," chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm Mike Mullen told the Center for Strategic and International Studies Tuesday, in an address on military challenges in the Middle East sponsored in connection with the embassy of the United Arab Emirates.

What exactly is so stable about Iran and the Middle East now? Is the present situation only considered stable because there isn't an all out war taking place? Instead, there is terrorist support and circumvention of governments in the region as well is on other continents? Iran has aligned itself with some of the more unstable regimes around the world. These same people are doing everything they can to destabilize free western governments. How does any of this represent being stable?

I am really sick of this relativistic view point. The Middle East, especially Iran, is NOT stable. If Israel were to attack Irans nuclear facilities it would not destabilize the region it would only change the perception of the non-stability that exists. Iran knows it can't win an all out war. The ayatollah is well aware of what would happen to him if Iran were invaded. He has taken the approach of pushing the envelope as far as he can go. Over time he realizes the west will react like a frog in a slowly warming pot. He has patience and the west is playing right into his plans.

The only thing that could throw this off would be a government that decides it has had enough. The western world would consider this government an overacting government. In truth, it would be a government that has decided to do what is right instead of waiting until its too late. This "overacting" government would be saving the rest of the world from its own ineptitude and would receive no thanks. In fact it would be castigated and probably be brought in front of the UN for violations of the imaginary international law.

E-mail me here.

Pure Stupidity

Defense Minister Ehud Barak met Middle East envoy George Mitchell for the second time in a week on Monday, and promised that Israel would evacuate 23 illegal outposts in the West Bank in a matter of weeks or months, as opposed to years, Army Radio reported.

This is more proof that hope is not a strategy. What exactly are the "palestinians" and the Arab/islamists going to do in return? That's right. NOTHING. Why is it always the Israelis that have to cede something while the "palestinians" sit back and respond with derision and accusations? What part of "the islamists will never officially recognize Israel as a legitimate Jewish nation? Ths islamists can have their own countries but if the Jews want their's that's just too bad.

It gets sickening watching the same failed strategy and tactics get used over and over. Binyamin Netanyahu should know better. It is sad to watch himi go down the same failed path as his predecessors. What happened to the man with the iron will that we heard in the election campaign? The same man who wrote about terrorism and its supporters is doing exactly the opposite of what he claimed would work.

This time next year, Israel will have given up its outposts yet Israelis will still be attacked and Arab/islamists will still be spewing its hatred of the Zionist entity.

This is pure murderous stupidity.

E-mail me here.